From LISTSERV@listserv.uic.edu Thu Aug 24 18:57:18 2000
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 20:55:59 -0500
From: "L-Soft list server at University of Illinois at Chicago (1.8d)"
    <LISTSERV@listserv.uic.edu>
To: Laura Quilter <lauraq@EXPLORATORIUM.EDU>
Subject: File: "FEMINISTSF-LIT LOG0001D"

=========================================================================
Date:         Sun, 23 Jan 2000 19:00:26 -0600
Reply-To:     Feminist SF/Fantasy and Utopia Literature ON TOPIC
              <FEMINISTSF-LIT@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
Sender:       Feminist SF/Fantasy and Utopia Literature ON TOPIC
              <FEMINISTSF-LIT@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
From:         Susan Hericks <hericks@MINDSPRING.COM>
Subject:      BDG: Briar Rose
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I finally had a chance to read Briar Rose and must say I generally argree
with most of the opinions expressed in the discussions so far, especially
that the writing seemd a bit clunky, the romance contrived, and Josef's
retelling of his Holocaust experience the mose engaging and memorable part
of the book.

I actually really enjoyed the character Magda and felt like I hadn't before
been given the chance to think about what it's like for the next generation
in Poland, Germany, etc. If the survivor's refusal to discuss what happened
is the norm in the US (according to what has been said in the discussion),
how much worse it must be to liveright where these atrocities happened and
not able to talk about it--or even to be aware of it, which seems like a
truly maddening silence and erasure of memory.

Along those lines, I was really struck by the scene where Becca and Magda
visit the town where the extermination camp was and the locals threaten them
with the same "nothing" that happened to all the other Jews who came there.
The whole question justice seems horrifying and impossible in the face of
such hate, especially when you later read the details of what happened
there.  The priest is an interesting figure.  I was grateful that Yolen
portrayed his honesty about not being able to forgive the townspeople for
what they did.

I think I would've been happier with the ending of the book if Yolen held on
a little more to this question of how the Holocost still effects the
survivors and their families beyond the optimism that ultimately seems to
gloss Gemma's "happily ever after."  Despite assurances that there is not
always a happy ending, that's what I felt like we got.  Is it enough  that
Gemma survived and had a loving family in  the US? Will Becca be like Stan,
just getting the story and then moving on? It seems like more is called for.

Susan
