From LISTSERV@listserv.uic.edu Fri Jan 26 13:39:04 2001
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:58:53 -0600
From: "L-Soft list server at UIC (1.8d)" <LISTSERV@listserv.uic.edu>
To: Laura Quilter <lquilter@FEMINISTSF.ORG>
Subject: File: "FEMINISTSF LOG0006C"

=========================================================================
Date:         Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:34:57 EDT
Reply-To:     ma46@drexel.edu
Sender:       "For discussion of feminist SF, fantastic & utopian literature"
              <FEMINISTSF@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
From:         Marietta Angelotti <mariettaangelotti@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Dangerous Visions & Harlan bashing
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

I just wanted to agree that reading stories like those of Ellison's meant a
lot to me in my early teens too--somehow showing me that the world was
indeed more complex and twisted than my own little corner of suburbia would
acknowledge. This has made me curious, though, to see what they would mean
to me as an adult.


>From: Dianne Kraft <103234.3341@COMPUSERVE.COM>
>Reply-To: "For discussion of feminist SF, fantastic & utopian literature"
>            <FEMINISTSF@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
>To: FEMINISTSF@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU
>Subject: [*FSFFU*] Dangerous Visions & Harlan bashing
>Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 19:13:09 -0400
>
>delurking here;
>
>   I don't think it's easy to imagine how powerful both Ellison's early
>books (e.g., I Have no Mouth and I Must Scream) and Dangerous Visions were
>to those of us who were in our teens and early 20's when they came out.
>Having been an sf fan since the age of 8 (when my father gave me all the
>Edgar Rice Burroughs' Tarzan and Mars books), Ellison was like a cold crisp
>wind bringing change and delight to me when I first encountered him (I
>guess I was about 12 or 13).
>And Dangerous Visions may seem dated now, but it sure didn't when it came
>out.    But that's been a while, now hasn't it?
>
>I need to say one more thing; as a friend, Harlan can be a pretty wonderful
>guy, and while it is much more fashionable to bash him and remember the
>more negative/flashy side, I just want to say that's not all there is.
>Aren't we all sometimes right and sometimes wrong, and which is which is in
>the eye of the beholder?
>
>Dianne Kraft
>
>--------------------------------------------------
>This is the FEMINISTSF listserve, intended only for
>discussion of feminism and Speculative Fiction. To
>unsubscribe from this listserve, send a message to
>LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU and in the body of the message say:
>                          unsubscribe FEMINISTSF
>
>Contact FEMINISTSF-request@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU if there are problems.

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

--------------------------------------------------
This is the FEMINISTSF listserve, intended only for
discussion of feminism and Speculative Fiction. To
unsubscribe from this listserve, send a message to
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU and in the body of the message say:
                         unsubscribe FEMINISTSF

Contact FEMINISTSF-request@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU if there are problems.
=========================================================================
Date:         Mon, 19 Jun 2000 20:12:36 0100
Reply-To:     "For discussion of feminist SF, fantastic & utopian literature"
              <FEMINISTSF@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
Sender:       "For discussion of feminist SF, fantastic & utopian literature"
              <FEMINISTSF@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
From:         Petra Mayerhofer <mayerhof@USF.UNI-KASSEL.DE>
Subject:      German SF conference on feminist SF (among others)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT

For the information of German-speaking list members:

there will be a SF conference in Bremen in December titled "Out of
this world! - Science-Fiction, Politik, Utopie -" and organized by the
redaction group of alaska. The announcement can be found at
http://www.fortunecity.de/tatooine/metropolis/100/verschiedenes/out
-of-this-world.html

The conference has three main topics:
- feminist SF and utopias,
- social science, politics and SF,
- pop culture and society;

It is aimed at 'normal people' and not academics. Nonetheless,
I call it a conference and not a SF-Con because it is NOT
organized from inside the 'SF scene' or from active SF fans. And it
does not offer any 'fannish' activities. I suppose I will receive some
emails now pointing out SF-Cons that can be described similarly ;-).

Petra



Petra Mayerhofer
mailto:mayerhofer@usf.uni-kassel.de
--
BDG website
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Comet/1304/

--------------------------------------------------
This is the FEMINISTSF listserve, intended only for
discussion of feminism and Speculative Fiction. To
unsubscribe from this listserve, send a message to
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU and in the body of the message say:
                         unsubscribe FEMINISTSF

Contact FEMINISTSF-request@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU if there are problems.
=========================================================================
Date:         Mon, 19 Jun 2000 18:26:41 -0500
Reply-To:     "For discussion of feminist SF, fantastic & utopian literature"
              <FEMINISTSF@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
Sender:       "For discussion of feminist SF, fantastic & utopian literature"
              <FEMINISTSF@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
From:         Todd Mason <Todd.Mason@TVGUIDE.COM>
Subject:      Re: Dangerous Visions & Harlan bashing: Angelotti after Kraft
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

One of the interesting things about DANGEROUS VISIONS, at least, is that a
lot of the same kind of material was already being published in such
magazines as GALAXY, IF, WORLDS OF TOMORROW, F&SF, admixed in the last new
material in FANTASTIC and AMAZING as their new publisher ran through the old
publisher's inventory, and of course in SF IMPULSE (formerly SCIENCE
FANTASY) and NEW WORLDS in the UK...as well as in Damon Knight's ORBIT
series of original anthologies, Judith Merril's best of the year and at
least to some extent Donald Wollheim and Terry Carr's boty annual (with
Harry Harrison's even more all-adventurous boty annual just around the
corner)...but that DV was an attempt to gather all-disturbing (if possible)
stories in one place with no dilution by other kinds of speculative fiction.
That, and Ellison's excellent sales technique, helped sell DV harder than
these other items, without the book being on average better than some of the
above-listed items.

No one was writing quite like him, though some came close (Allen Kim Lang is
one of the forgotten who did on occasion).
-----Original Message-----
From: Marietta Angelotti [mailto:mariettaangelotti@HOTMAIL.COM]

I just wanted to agree that reading stories like those of Ellison's meant a
lot to me in my early teens too--somehow showing me that the world was
indeed more complex and twisted than my own little corner of suburbia would
acknowledge. This has made me curious, though, to see what they would mean
to me as an adult.


>From: Dianne Kraft <103234.3341@COMPUSERVE.COM>
>Reply-To: "For discussion of feminist SF, fantastic & utopian literature"
>            <FEMINISTSF@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
>To: FEMINISTSF@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU
>Subject: [*FSFFU*] Dangerous Visions & Harlan bashing
>Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 19:13:09 -0400
>
>delurking here;
>
>   I don't think it's easy to imagine how powerful both Ellison's early
>books (e.g., I Have no Mouth and I Must Scream) and Dangerous Visions were
>to those of us who were in our teens and early 20's when they came out.
>Having been an sf fan since the age of 8 (when my father gave me all the
>Edgar Rice Burroughs' Tarzan and Mars books), Ellison was like a cold crisp
>wind bringing change and delight to me when I first encountered him (I
>guess I was about 12 or 13).
>And Dangerous Visions may seem dated now, but it sure didn't when it came
>out.    But that's been a while, now hasn't it?
>
>I need to say one more thing; as a friend, Harlan can be a pretty wonderful
>guy, and while it is much more fashionable to bash him and remember the
>more negative/flashy side, I just want to say that's not all there is.
>Aren't we all sometimes right and sometimes wrong, and which is which is in
>the eye of the beholder?
>
>Dianne Kraft

--------------------------------------------------
This is the FEMINISTSF listserve, intended only for
discussion of feminism and Speculative Fiction. To
unsubscribe from this listserve, send a message to
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU and in the body of the message say:
                         unsubscribe FEMINISTSF

Contact FEMINISTSF-request@LISTSERV.UIC.EDU if there are problems.
