Re: [*FSFFU*] New Female Identities (was average heights of women and men, which was GI Jane)

From: Nalo Hopkinson (bl213@FREENET.TORONTO.ON.CA)
Date: Fri Sep 12 1997 - 05:03:31 PDT


On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, MARINA YERESHENKO wrote:

> a lot. However, I don't think it somehow affects upper/lower body
> strength relation.

NH: Sorry, didn't mean to imply a correlation between the two. Just went
off on a wingy tangent, which I'm wont to do.

> Besides, I've never heard that women's lower bodies
> were stronger than men's. Why would that be?

NH: *Proportionally* stronger, as I understand it. I was taught it when
I was a fitness instructor. No theories as to why it's so.

-nalo

"There are two kinds of dates; the kind that you go out with, and the
small fruit that you eat."
                                -my aunt



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 25 2000 - 19:06:41 PDT