and she
>answered 3%: i.e. only the top 3% of women are faster than the the bottom
>3% of men: is this not a major under-estimation? I was quite depressed
>about this. It seemed wrong (not to mention unjust)
Perhaps the sample wasn't big enough, but how can a statistic be "just" or
"unjust"? Perhaps you mean given the sentence below?
to me, looking over my
>class mates: the young women seemed alot more impressive than they were
>being given credit for, and the young men a lot less.
-Sean
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 25 2000 - 19:06:41 PDT