Martha Bartter wrote:
> And Mike replied:
> >It seems to me that anyone who thinks that Ray Bradbury isn't a
> science
> >fiction or fantasy writer (not counting his mysteries and Irish
> stories)
> >shouldn't be allowed to give papers or write about him because they
> >obviously don't KNOW anything about him.
>
> Mike: would you consider Ray Bradbury an ANTI-science fiction writer?
> I do.
Actually, I'm going to go far out on a limb with this one and think Mike
and I are going to agree (for once): Bradbury, like Ellison, is a
speculative fiction writer. I don't think that the argument can be made
that he is "anti-" anything interms of science. Some of his works could
be non-traditional SF, but I don't think that's anti-SF.
- Geoffrey
-- "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." - Ford Prefect
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 25 2000 - 19:07:29 PDT