"Brigid Venables." <9309629n@MAGPIE.MAGILL.UNISA.EDU.AU> wrote:
>In response to this claim-
>>
>> << I think there are distinct differences in masculine and feminine styles
>> of expression, if not of thought, although how in hell we can ever
untangle
>> how much is "inborn" from how much is culturally inculcated I do not know.
>
>I'd like those who know a little more about cyborg theory to help me
>here, please - but I wonder why it is necessary to 'untangle' that which
>is inborn from that which is culturally inculcated, in order to achieve a
>coherent and interesting narrative style.
What is "cyborg theory"?
I don't have the entire thread in front of me, but was "coherant and
interesting narrative" the original point?
<snip>
>Regarding science fiction - technology could be
>used to 'mask' or subvert ones sex or sexuality (we haven't even started
>on queer theory)
"Queer theory"? I have trouble making sense of the phrase. What do you mean?
Neil Rest
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 25 2000 - 19:06:25 PDT