I really like the bookgroup idea, too. I used to be in a face to face
group, and I find it interesting to see that most groups eventually work to
a similar structure.
>1) We would need an organizer - someone to post the reading schedule on
>their web page, open up discussion on the given day, etc.
Too true. I would suggest that someone volunteers to think of some issues
for discussion for each book (doesn't have to be the same person).
>4) Openess: we would have to be willing to read not only things we've
>read before, but also things that don't fall within the realm of
>"books," such as sequential art (or comic books, if you will).
Reading something new and different is the best part of book groups. There
are heaps of things I would never read off my own bat, but that I would
read for a book discussion.
Robyn
***********************************
Robyn Starkey
University of Melbourne
r.starkey@elp.unimelb.edu.au
************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 25 2000 - 19:07:43 PDT